The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Distance between Numerical Monograph and Mathematical Sociology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron, January 2003
|
DOI | 10.4057/jsr.53.4_485 |
Authors |
Toru KIKKAWA |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 3 | 25% |
China | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,021,075
of 26,482,926 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron
#53
of 694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,169
of 139,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,482,926 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 694 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them