The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of Extract of Guava Leaves on the Development of Diabetes in the db/db Mouse and on the Postprandial Blood Glucose of Human Subjects
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi, January 1998
|
DOI | 10.1271/nogeikagaku1924.72.923 |
Authors |
Yoriko DEGUCHI, Kuniko OSADA, Kazumi UCHIDA, Hiroko KIMURA, Masaki YOSHIKAWA, KUDO Tatsuyuki, Hisako YASUI, Masaaki WATANUKI |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,895,047
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi
#264
of 7,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,645
of 95,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.