You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A study of the time necessary for calcium hydroxide to eliminate microorganisms in infected canals
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, December 2004
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1678-77572003000200009 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carlos Estrela, Cyntia Rodrigues de Araújo Estrela, Jesus Djalma Pécora |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 29% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 29% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 79% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
Psychology | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2008.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#101
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,054
of 151,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them