The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A numerical investigation of head waves and leaky modes in fluid-filled boreholes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geophysics, July 1986
|
DOI | 10.1190/1.1442192 |
Authors |
Frederick L. Paillet, C. H. Cheng |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 40% |
Researcher | 2 | 20% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 60% |
Mathematics | 1 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Engineering | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2010.
All research outputs
#4,765,219
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Geophysics
#260
of 2,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,231
of 10,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysics
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.