The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Phase I Antibody Risks, Trial Safety Examined
|
---|---|
Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, July 2006
|
DOI | 10.1093/jnci/djj315 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rabiya S Tuma |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 38% |
Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Researcher | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 25% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,726,499
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#4,271
of 7,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,183
of 91,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#29
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.