The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
OncoTargets and therapy, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.2147/ott.s112105 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lu Lv, Weidong Hu, Yanchen Ren, Xiaoxuan Wei |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Other | 12 | 21% |
Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 72% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,738,637
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#564
of 3,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,814
of 334,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#18
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.