The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Iodine supplementation for preventing iodine deficiency disorders in children
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003819.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lucia Angermayr, Christine Clar |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 104 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
Researcher | 14 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 15% |
Unknown | 29 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Psychology | 6 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 30 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,876,162
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,546
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,350
of 62,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.