The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Desulfurization of Bitumen by Hydrothermal Upgrading Process in Supercritical Water with Alkali
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute, January 2006
|
DOI | 10.1627/jpi.49.177 |
Authors |
Atsushi Kishita, Satoru Takahashi, Yuki Yamasaki, Fangmin Jin, Takehiko Moriya, Heiji Enomoto |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
Researcher | 2 | 25% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 25% |
Engineering | 2 | 25% |
Chemistry | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute
#15
of 71 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,445
of 155,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.