The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Different schematic eyes and their accuracy to the in vivo eye: a quantitative comparison study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Physics, June 2007
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0103-97332007000300008 |
Authors |
Marina Storani de Almeida, Luis Alberto Carvalho |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Russia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 80 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
Researcher | 15 | 16% |
Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Other | 19 | 21% |
Unknown | 11 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 24 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Unknown | 15 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Physics
#30
of 371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,997
of 82,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Physics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 371 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.