Catarina Santos, Suzy Turiel, Pedro Sousa Gomes, Elísio Costa, Alice Santos-Silva, Paulo Quadros, José Duarte, Sílvia Battistuzzo, Maria Helena Fernandes
Abstract
Vascular homeostasis is ensured by a dynamic interplay involving the endothelium, the platelets and the coagulation system. Thus, the vascular safety of particulate materials must address this integrated system, an approach that has been largely neglected. This work analysed the effects of commercial hydroxyapatite (HA) particles in blood compatibility and in endothelial cell behavior, due to their clinical relevance and scarcity of data on their vascular biosafety.
Particles with similar chemical composition and distinct size and morphology were tested, i.e. rod-like, nano dimensions and low aspect ratio (HAp1) and needle-shape with wider size and aspect ratio (HAp2). HAp1 and HAp2, at 1 to 10 mg/mL, did not affect haemolysis, platelet adhesion, aggregation and activation, or the coagulation system (intrinsic and extrinsic pathways), although HAp2 exhibited a slight thrombogenic potential at 10 mg/mL. Notwithstanding, significantly lower levels presented dose-dependent toxicity on endothelial cells' behavior. HAp1 and HAp2 decreased cell viability at levels ≥ 250 and ≥ 50 μg/mL, respectively. At 10 and 50 μg/mL, HAp1 did not interfere with the F-actin cytoskeleton, apoptotic index, cell cycle progression, expression of vWF, VECad and CD31, and the ability to form a network of tubular-like structures. Comparatively, HAp2 caused dose-dependent toxic effects in these parameters in the same concentration range.
The most relevant observation is the great discrepancy of HA particles' levels that interfere with the routine blood compatibility assays and the endothelial cell behavior. Further, this difference was also found to be dependent on the particles' size, morphology and aspect ratio, emphasizing the need of a complementary biological characterization, taking into consideration the endothelial cells' functionality, to establish the vascular safety of particulate HA.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
2
6%
Engineering
2
6%
Other
5
15%
Unknown
16
47%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,509,310
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#1,254
of 1,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,731
of 332,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,449 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
