The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bayesian estimation of weak material dispersion: theory and experiment.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Optics Express Online, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1364/oe.18.002076 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J M Nichols, M Currie, F Bucholtz, W A Link |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 42% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
Professor | 2 | 17% |
Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 5 | 42% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 17% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,949,326
of 26,391,552 outputs
Outputs from Optics Express Online
#4,173
of 14,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,717
of 177,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Optics Express Online
#70
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,391,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,843 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.