↓ Skip to main content

Developmental plasticity of spatial hearing following asymmetric hearing loss: context-dependent cue integration and its clinical implications

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developmental plasticity of spatial hearing following asymmetric hearing loss: context-dependent cue integration and its clinical implications
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Keating, Andrew J. King

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 25%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 26%
Neuroscience 16 14%
Psychology 13 11%
Engineering 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 23 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,340,005
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#959
of 1,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,901
of 281,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#67
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.