The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Occluder Shadows for Fast Walkthroughs of Urban Environments
|
---|---|
Published in |
Computer Graphics Forum, December 2001
|
DOI | 10.1111/1467-8659.00327 |
Authors |
Peter Wonka, Dieter Schmalstieg |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 19% |
Austria | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 19% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 19% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 14 | 88% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,247,700
of 24,701,898 outputs
Outputs from Computer Graphics Forum
#465
of 1,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,879
of 129,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Graphics Forum
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,518 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.