Title |
The Drivers of Heuristic Optimization in Insect Object Manufacture and Use
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01015 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Natasha Mhatre, Daniel Robert |
Abstract |
Insects have small brains and heuristics or 'rules of thumb' are proposed here to be a good model for how insects optimize the objects they make and use. Generally, heuristics are thought to increase the speed of decision making by reducing the computational resources needed for making decisions. By corollary, heuristic decisions are also deemed to impose a compromise in decision accuracy. Using examples from object optimization behavior in insects, we will argue that heuristics do not inevitably imply a lower computational burden or lower decision accuracy. We also show that heuristic optimization may be driven by certain features of the optimization problem itself: the properties of the object being optimized, the biology of the insect, and the properties of the function being optimized. We also delineate the structural conditions under which heuristic optimization may achieve accuracy equivalent to or better than more fine-grained and onerous optimization methods. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
Scientists | 9 | 36% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 40% |
Student > Master | 5 | 25% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 60% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 10% |
Engineering | 2 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 1 | 5% |