The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cell cycle dependent transcription, a determinant factor of heterogeneity in cationic lipid‐mediated transgene expression
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Gene Medicine - Gene Therapy Clinical Trial Database, March 2007
|
DOI | 10.1002/jgm.1010 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hidetaka Akita, Rie Ito, Hiroyuki Kamiya, Kentaro Kogure, Hideyoshi Harashima |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 30% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 22% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 9% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 17% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
Chemistry | 2 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gene Medicine - Gene Therapy Clinical Trial Database
#360
of 985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,918
of 89,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gene Medicine - Gene Therapy Clinical Trial Database
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.