The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complex interventions for preventing diabetic foot ulceration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007610.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruben C Hoogeveen, Johannes AN Dorresteijn, Didi MW Kriegsman, Gerlof D Valk |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 456 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 16% |
| Researcher | 55 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 91 | 20% |
| Unknown | 140 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 129 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 89 | 19% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 52 | 11% |
| Unknown | 154 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2024.
All research outputs
#1,794,805
of 26,404,318 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,658
of 13,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,381
of 278,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#87
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,404,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.