You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Credibilistic TOPSIS Model for Evaluation and Selection of Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Methods
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 17 |
Book title |
Advances in Waste Management
|
Published in |
arXiv, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-981-13-0215-2_17 |
Book ISBNs |
978-9-81-130214-5, 978-9-81-130215-2
|
Authors |
Methods Jagannath Roy, Krishnendu Adhikary, Samarjit Kar, Jagannath Roy, Roy, Jagannath, Adhikary, Krishnendu, Kar, Samarjit |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 4 | 24% |
Computer Science | 3 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,379,760
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#374,466
of 939,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,074
of 436,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#10,280
of 24,454 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 939,638 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24,454 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.