↓ Skip to main content

An Electrostatic Method for Manufacturing Liquid Marbles and Particle-Stabilized Aggregates

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Electrostatic Method for Manufacturing Liquid Marbles and Particle-Stabilized Aggregates
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2018.00280
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter M. Ireland, Casey A. Thomas, Benjamin T. Lobel, Grant B. Webber, Syuji Fujii, Erica J. Wanless

Abstract

We have developed a method for transferring particles from a powder bed to a liquid droplet using an electric field. This process has been used to create liquid marbles with characteristics not normally found in those formed by direct contact methods such as rolling. It has also been used to manufacture hydrophilic particle-liquid aggregates and more complex layered aggregates incorporating both hydrophobic and hydrophilic particles. This article briefly outlines the electrostatic aggregation method itself, the materials used and structures formed thus far, and explores the rich fundamental physics and chemistry underpinning the process as they are understood at present.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 27%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Physics and Astronomy 1 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,545,254
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#838
of 6,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,389
of 326,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#37
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,038 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.