↓ Skip to main content

Structured Floral Arrangement Program Benefits in Patients With Neurocognitive Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structured Floral Arrangement Program Benefits in Patients With Neurocognitive Disorder
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01328
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroko Mochizuki-Kawai, Izumi Kotani, Satoshi Mochizuki, Yuriko Yamakawa

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 29%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Design 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2024.
All research outputs
#9,074,998
of 26,728,046 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#13,046
of 35,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,595
of 345,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#377
of 717 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,728,046 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 717 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.