The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 392 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Degradation of Single‐Layer and Few‐Layer Graphene by Neutrophil Myeloperoxidase
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/anie.201806906 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rajendra Kurapati, Sourav P. Mukherjee, Cristina Martín, George Bepete, Ester Vázquez, Alain Pénicaud, Bengt Fadeel, Alberto Bianco |
| Abstract |
Biodegradability of graphene is one of the fundamental parameters determining the fate in vivo of this material. Here, two types of aqueous dispersible graphene, corresponding to single layer (SLG) and few layer graphene (FLG), devoid of either chemical functionalisation or stabilizing surfactants, were subjected to biodegradation by human myeloperoxidase (hMPO) mediated catalysis. Graphene biodegradation was also studied in the presence of activated, degranulating human neutrophils. The degradation of both FLG and SLG sheets was confirmed by Raman spectroscopy and electron microscopy analyses, leading to the conclusion that highly dispersed pristine graphene is not biopersistent. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 59 | 15% |
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Georgia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 312 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 377 | 96% |
| Scientists | 8 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 21 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 16 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 12 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 22% |
| Unknown | 32 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 383. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#86,233
of 26,582,041 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#12
of 52,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,650
of 345,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#2
of 807 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,582,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 807 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.