↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Environmental Temperature on the Content of Impurity Li3V2(PO4)3/C in LiVPO4F/C Cathode for Lithium-ion Batteries

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Environmental Temperature on the Content of Impurity Li3V2(PO4)3/C in LiVPO4F/C Cathode for Lithium-ion Batteries
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2018.00283
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taotao Zeng, Changling Fan, Zheng Wen, Qiyuan Li, Zeyan Zhou, Shaochang Han, Jinshui Liu

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the impurity Li3V2(PO4)3 in LiVPO4F will adversely affect its electrochemical performance. In this work, we show that the crystalline composition of LiVPO4F/C is mainly influenced by the environmental temperature. The content of Li3V2(PO4)3 formed in LiVPO4F/C is 0, 11.84 and 18.75% at environmental temperatures of 10, 20, and 30°C, respectively. For the sample LVPF-30C, the SEM pattern shows a kind of alveolate microstructure and the result of selected area electron diffraction shows two sets of patterns. The LiVPO4F/C cathode without impurity phase Li3V2(PO4)3 was prepared at 10°C. The selected area electron diffraction result proves that the lattice pattern of LiVPO4F is a regular parallelogram. Electrochemical tests show that only one flat plateau around 4.2 V appears in the charge/discharge curve, and the reversible capacity is 140.4 mAh·g-1 at 0.1 C, and 116.3 mAh·g-1 at 5 C. From these analyses, it is reasonable to speculate that synthesizing LiVPO4F/C at a low environmental temperature is a practical strategy to obtain pure crystalline phase and good electrochemical performance.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 43%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 29%
Engineering 2 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,950
of 6,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,196
of 329,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#113
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,040 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.