The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of a Novel Database That Rapidly Provides Valuable Information Efficiently Aimed at Improving the Safety of the Simple Suspension Method
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.11256/jjdi.17.69 |
Authors |
Masahiro Watanabe, Tatsuya Tai, Shigeko Tsuji, Hiroaki Tanaka, Takahiro Motoki, Kazunori Yamaguchi, Kenta Sumiyoshi, Takato Nozaki, Masato Kaji, Masato Asakura, Shinji Kosaka, Hitoshi Houchi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#17,446,400
of 26,587,745 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics
#55
of 122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,526
of 287,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,587,745 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.