↓ Skip to main content

Does Cognitive Behavior Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) show a sustainable effect on delusions? A meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does Cognitive Behavior Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) show a sustainable effect on delusions? A meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01450
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie Mehl, Dirk Werner, Tania M. Lincoln

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 253 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 19%
Student > Bachelor 40 16%
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 9%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 63 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 139 54%
Neuroscience 13 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 72 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,541,109
of 26,626,138 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,781
of 35,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,427
of 290,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#107
of 531 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,626,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 531 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.