↓ Skip to main content

Canine Pluripotent Stem Cells: Are They Ready for Clinical Applications?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Canine Pluripotent Stem Cells: Are They Ready for Clinical Applications?
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2015.00041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dean H. Betts, Ian C. Tobias

Abstract

The derivation of canine embryonic stem cells and generation of canine-induced pluripotent stem cells are significant achievements that have unlocked the potential for developing novel cell-based disease models, drug discovery platforms, and transplantation therapies in the dog. A progression from concept to cure in this clinically relevant companion animal will not only help our canine patients but also help advance human regenerative medicine. Nevertheless, many issues remain to be resolved before pluripotent cells can be used clinically in a safe and reproducible manner.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,223,325
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,296
of 6,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,608
of 278,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.