Title |
A possible mechanism of biological silicification in plants
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2015.00853 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher Exley |
Abstract |
Plants are significant exponents of biological silicification. While not all plants are generally considered as biosilicifiers the extent to which all plants deposit biogenic silica is largely unknown. There are plants which are known as silica accumulators though even in these plants the extent and degree to which their tissues are silicified is neither appreciated nor understood. An elucidation of the mechanism of silicification in biota is complicated by a lack of known bio-organic chemistry of silicic acid, the starting point in this process. Herein I argue the case that biological silicification is an entirely passive process. It is passive from the point of view that its underlying mechanisms and processes do not require us to invoke any as yet undiscovered silicon biochemistry. It is also passive in that although silicification confers clear biological/ecological advantages under certain conditions, it is actually non-essential in all plants and potentially, at least, toxic in some. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Croatia | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 125 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 20% |
Researcher | 18 | 14% |
Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Professor | 7 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 18% |
Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 44% |
Chemistry | 8 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Unknown | 39 | 30% |