↓ Skip to main content

介助動作に必要な便所及び浴室のスペースに関する実験

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), January 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
介助動作に必要な便所及び浴室のスペースに関する実験
Published in
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), January 1998
DOI 10.3130/aija.63.145_2
Authors

後藤 義明, 相良 二朗, 田中 直人, 中島 康生, 田中 真二, 堀田 明裕

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#364
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,527
of 94,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.