The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Phyla- and Subtype-Selectivity of CgNa, a Na+ Channel Toxin from the Venom of the Giant Caribbean Sea Anemone Condylactis Gigantea
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2010.00133 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bert Billen, Sarah Debaveye, Lászlo Béress, Anoland Garateix, Jan Tytgat |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 38% |
Student > Master | 4 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 50% |
Chemistry | 2 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,468,281
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,272
of 16,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,434
of 164,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,070 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.