↓ Skip to main content

Type IV secretion system of Brucella spp. and its effectors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Type IV secretion system of Brucella spp. and its effectors
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuehua Ke, Yufei Wang, Wengfeng Li, Zeliang Chen

Abstract

Brucella spp. are intracellular bacterial pathogens that cause infection in domestic and wild animals. They are often used as model organisms to study intracellular bacterial infections. Brucella VirB T4SS is a key virulence factor that plays important roles in mediating intracellular survival and manipulating host immune response to infection. In this review, we discuss the roles of Brucella VirB T4SS and 15 effectors that are proposed to be crucial for Brucella pathogenesis. VirB T4SS regulates the inflammation response and manipulates vesicle trafficking inside host cells. VirB T4SS also plays crucial roles in the inhibition of the host immune response and intracellular survival during infection. Here, we list the key molecular events in the intracellular life cycle of Brucella that are potentially targeted by the VirB T4SS effectors. Elucidating the functions of these effectors will help clarify the molecular role of T4SS during infection. Furthermore, studying the effectors secreted by Brucella spp. might provide insights into the mechanisms used by the bacteria to hijack the host signaling pathways and aid in the development of better vaccines and therapies against brucellosis.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 173 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 25%
Student > Master 29 17%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 28 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 33 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,429,163
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#4,830
of 6,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,826
of 279,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.