↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire among Brazilian Families of School-Aged Children

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire among Brazilian Families of School-Aged Children
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2015.00035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laís Amaral Mais, Sarah Warkentin, Maria do Rosário Dias de Oliveira Latorre, Susan Carnell, José Augusto de Aguiar Carrazedo Taddei

Abstract

Children's eating behaviors are influenced by parents, who are the first nutritional educators. The comprehensive feeding practices questionnaire (CFPQ) was developed to measure feeding practices among parents, but has not yet been validated in Brazil, where child obesity rates are steeply increasing. The aim of the study was to test the validity of the CFPQ among Brazilian parents of school-aged children and propose a new version of the instrument. Transcultural adaptation included translation into Portuguese, back translation, content validity, testing for semantic equivalence, and piloting. Questionnaire data were obtained for 659 parents of 5- to 9-year olds. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses and psychometric analyses (tests for internal consistency, factor correlations, item-discriminant and convergent validity, and test-retest reliability) were conducted. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a poor fit of the data to the original 12-factor model. Exploratory factor analysis generated a 6-factor model composed of 42 items: healthy eating guidance, monitoring, restriction for weight control, restriction for health, emotion regulation/food as reward, and pressure. This factor solution was supported by internal consistency tests (α = 0.71-0.91) and factor correlations (ρ = -0.16 to 0.32). Item-discriminant and convergent validity tests showed that parents who used coercive practices had more overweight children and were more concerned about their child's weight (ρ = 0.09-0.40). Test-retest reliability was acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.45-0.77). Since parental practices are highly culturally and age group sensitive, it is essential to conduct careful evaluations of questionnaires when introduced into specific age groups within new cultural settings. This modified six-factor model of the CFPQ is valid to measure parental feeding behaviors of school-aged children in urban Brazilian settings.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 92 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Psychology 9 9%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 29 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,429,829
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,992
of 4,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,178
of 285,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.