The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Trends and patterns of family planning methods used among women attending family planning clinic in a rural setting in sub-Sahara Africa: the case of Mbalmayo District Hospital, Cameroon
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, August 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13104-018-3658-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul Nkemtendong Tolefac, Theophile Njamen Nana, Eugene Vernyuy Yeika, Nkemnji Stanley Awungafac, Yolande Ntsama, Phillipe Nana Njotang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 22 | 21% |
Unspecified | 10 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
Researcher | 8 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 11% |
Unknown | 40 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 15% |
Unspecified | 10 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 11% |
Unknown | 40 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#21,490,139
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,309
of 4,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,981
of 345,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#109
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.