↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Outlook for Type-1 and FOXP3+ T Regulatory Cell-Based Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Outlook for Type-1 and FOXP3+ T Regulatory Cell-Based Therapy
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00593
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Gregori, Laura Passerini, Maria-Grazia Roncarolo

Abstract

T regulatory cells (Tregs) are subsets of T lymphocytes specialized in modulating antigen-specific immune responses in vivo. Hence, Tregs represent an ideal therapeutic tool to control detrimental immune reactions. Based on solid pre-clinical results, investigators started testing the safety and efficacy of Treg-based therapies in humans. Despite promising results, a number of issues remain to be solved. We will discuss the results obtained from clinical trials and the challenges and risks we are facing in the further development of Treg-based therapies.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 76 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 26%
Researcher 20 25%
Student > Master 11 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 23 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 8 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,713,861
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#8,870
of 31,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,371
of 393,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#40
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.