The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Open and Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00063 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Benjamin D. Kuhns, Rachel M. Frank, Luis Pulido |
Abstract |
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain, and when indicated, can be successfully managed through open surgery or hip arthroscopy. The goal of this review is to describe the different approaches to the surgical treatment of FAI. We present the indications, surgical technique, rehabilitation, and complications associated with (1) open hip dislocation, (2) reverse periacetabular osteotomy, (3) the direct anterior "mini-open" approach, and (4) arthroscopic surgery for FAI. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 19% |
Unknown | 20 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 54% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2016.
All research outputs
#12,878,778
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#298
of 2,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,413
of 387,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,868 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.