↓ Skip to main content

Impacts of the North American signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) on European ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Sciences Europe, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impacts of the North American signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) on European ecosystems
Published in
Environmental Sciences Europe, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12302-015-0065-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne Vaeßen, Henner Hollert

Abstract

As a vector of the crayfish plague (Aphanomyces astaci), invasive crayfish pose a major threat to endemic crayfish species in Europe. But do they affect whole ecosystems and fish species as well? A comprehensive review was done using online search engines on current literature to elucidate possible crayfish effects. It showed that they have the potential to decimate benthic invertebrate populations as well as submerged plants-the first a necessary food source, the second an important part of the habitat of fish, functioning as hiding space for their fry as well as their prey. Crayfish are suspected to act as bioturbators as well, by influencing preconditions to certain algae and animals while sorting through the substrate of a river. Their long-term effects on fish so far are inconclusive. Studies on this matter showed no effect, selective impact on fish that share prey with the crayfish, as well as significantly negative effects on fish in general. In shorter examinations, invasive crayfish have proven to displace fish from shelters, putting them at a higher risk for predation. Moreover, comparisons to native crayfish species showed that these had less negative effects on fish-due to lower consumption and reproduction rates and population densities.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 31 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 22 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2021.
All research outputs
#18,432,465
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#449
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,827
of 389,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.