↓ Skip to main content

Ribosomal Protein S6 Phosphorylation in the Nervous System: From Regulation to Function

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ribosomal Protein S6 Phosphorylation in the Nervous System: From Regulation to Function
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, December 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2015.00075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Biever, Emmanuel Valjent, Emma Puighermanal

Abstract

Since the discovery of the phosphorylation of the 40S ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6) about four decades ago, much effort has been made to uncover the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of this post-translational modification. In the field of neuroscience, rpS6 phosphorylation is commonly used as a readout of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 signaling activation or as a marker for neuronal activity. Nevertheless, its biological role in neurons still remains puzzling. Here we review the pharmacological and physiological stimuli regulating this modification in the nervous system as well as the pathways that transduce these signals into rpS6 phosphorylation. Altered rpS6 phosphorylation observed in various genetic and pathophysiological mouse models is also discussed. Finally, we examine the current state of knowledge on the physiological role of this post-translational modification and highlight the questions that remain to be addressed.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 299 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 19%
Researcher 46 15%
Student > Master 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 61 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 68 23%
Neuroscience 61 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 73 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#13,960,695
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1,426
of 2,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,816
of 390,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.