The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Greater sage‐grouse vital rates after wildfire
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.21573 |
Authors |
Lee J. Foster, Katie M. Dugger, Christian A. Hagen, David A. Budeau |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 27% |
Student > Master | 11 | 22% |
Researcher | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 41% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 20% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,288,296
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#740
of 2,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,447
of 345,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.