↓ Skip to main content

HFA-BDP Metered-Dose Inhaler Exhaled Through the Nose Improves Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Bronchial Asthma: A Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HFA-BDP Metered-Dose Inhaler Exhaled Through the Nose Improves Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Bronchial Asthma: A Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02192
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshiki Kobayashi, Hirotaka Yasuba, Mikiya Asako, Takahisa Yamamoto, Hiroshi Takano, Koichi Tomoda, Akira Kanda, Hiroshi Iwai

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 9 14%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 24 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Unspecified 9 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 25 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2019.
All research outputs
#20,775,306
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#24,979
of 31,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,095
of 351,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#507
of 626 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 626 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.