The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dynamic Complexity of Spontaneous BOLD Activity in Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Multiscale Entropy Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00677 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yan Niu, Bin Wang, Mengni Zhou, Jiayue Xue, Habib Shapour, Rui Cao, Xiaohong Cui, Jinglong Wu, Jie Xiang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 60% |
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
Researcher | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 22% |
Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 12 | 18% |
Computer Science | 7 | 10% |
Engineering | 6 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
Psychology | 5 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,082,430
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,104
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,093
of 354,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#56
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.