The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exposition to Factors of the Investment Funds Market in Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1590/1808-057x201702940 |
Authors |
Cláudia Olímpia Neves Mamede Maestri, Rodrigo Fernandes Malaquias |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 29% |
Student > Master | 3 | 21% |
Professor | 2 | 14% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 36% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 21% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Contabilidade & Finanças
#24
of 74 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,825
of 421,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Contabilidade & Finanças
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them