The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Chinese Herbal Medicine: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, November 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.280.18.1585 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A Bensoussan, N J Talley, M Hing, R Menzies, A Guo, M Ngu |
| Abstract |
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional bowel disorder for which there is no reliable medical treatment. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Israel | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 17% |
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#394,932
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#4,587
of 36,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124
of 41,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#7
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.