The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Trehalose Protects Cells from Injury Caused by Acids or Cigarette Smoke Constituents (Studies on cytoprotective properties of trehalose)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi, January 2007
|
DOI | 10.3136/nskkk.54.374 |
Authors |
Miho Aga, Manabu Miyata, Chie Ushio, Chiyo Yoshizane, Toshio Ariyasu, Shigeyuki Arai, Tsunetaka Ohta, Shigeharu Fukuda |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2013.
All research outputs
#8,850,931
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#114
of 686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,279
of 171,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 686 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.