↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
52 news outlets
blogs
25 blogs
twitter
1287 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
34 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
13 Google+ users
reddit
4 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2016
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0146193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ming-Jin Liu, Cai-Hua Xiong, Le Xiong, Xiao-Lin Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,287 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 2%
Germany 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 250 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 19%
Researcher 46 17%
Student > Master 37 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Professor 19 7%
Other 54 20%
Unknown 44 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 25%
Engineering 28 10%
Environmental Science 21 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 7%
Psychology 12 4%
Other 67 25%
Unknown 56 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1424. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,971
of 26,078,244 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#114
of 227,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93
of 403,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2
of 4,940 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,078,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 227,521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,940 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.