↓ Skip to main content

Twenty years of load theory—Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
547 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Twenty years of load theory—Where are we now, and where should we go next?
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, January 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0982-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gillian Murphy, John A. Groeger, Ciara M. Greene

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 547 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 541 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 163 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 14%
Student > Master 64 12%
Researcher 35 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 5%
Other 57 10%
Unknown 127 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 275 50%
Neuroscience 42 8%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Computer Science 11 2%
Engineering 11 2%
Other 55 10%
Unknown 139 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,621,279
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#388
of 2,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,443
of 404,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.