The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exercise for treating fibromyalgia syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003786.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angela J Busch, Karen A.R. Barber, Tom J Overend, Paul Michael J Peloso, Candice L Schachter |
| Abstract |
Fibromyalgia (FMS) is a syndrome expressed by chronic widespread body pain which leads to reduced physical function and frequent use of health care services. Exercise training is commonly recommended as a treatment. This is an update of a review published in Issue 2, 2002. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Mexico | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 82% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 866 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 844 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 136 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 135 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 67 | 8% |
| Researcher | 53 | 6% |
| Other | 175 | 20% |
| Unknown | 231 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 253 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 141 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 55 | 6% |
| Psychology | 46 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 3% |
| Other | 100 | 12% |
| Unknown | 247 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#696,806
of 26,560,982 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,200
of 13,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,071
of 90,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,560,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.