The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impacts of environmental filters on functional redundancy in riparian vegetation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12619 |
| Authors |
Daniel Bruno, Cayetano Gutiérrez‐Cánovas, David Sánchez‐Fernández, Josefa Velasco, Christer Nilsson |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 21% |
| Researcher | 38 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 43 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 61 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 59 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#481,229
of 26,455,955 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#259
of 4,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,144
of 313,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#5
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,455,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.