↓ Skip to main content

Hemispheric Asymmetries in Radial Line Bisection: Role of Retinotopic and Spatiotopic Factors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hemispheric Asymmetries in Radial Line Bisection: Role of Retinotopic and Spatiotopic Factors
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02200
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergio Chieffi, Giovanni Messina, Ines Villano, Antonietta Messina, Ciro Rosario Ilardi, Marcellino Monda, Monica Salerno, Francesco Sessa, Maria Pina Mollica, Gina Cavaliere, Giovanna Trinchese, Fabiano Cimmino, Paolo Murabito, Angela Catapano, Vincenzo Monda

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 64%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Psychology 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 10 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2018.
All research outputs
#17,996,379
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#20,915
of 30,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,625
of 344,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#547
of 806 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 806 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.