↓ Skip to main content

Modeling the Thin‐Layer Drying of Fruits and Vegetables: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
410 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
729 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling the Thin‐Layer Drying of Fruits and Vegetables: A Review
Published in
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety, February 2016
DOI 10.1111/1541-4337.12196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel I Onwude, Norhashila Hashim, Rimfiel B Janius, Nazmi Mat Nawi, Khalina Abdan

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 729 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 726 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 97 13%
Student > Bachelor 91 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 12%
Researcher 51 7%
Lecturer 33 5%
Other 108 15%
Unknown 261 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 161 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 15%
Chemical Engineering 70 10%
Energy 20 3%
Chemistry 13 2%
Other 54 7%
Unknown 304 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2024.
All research outputs
#6,754,661
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety
#397
of 946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,028
of 405,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.