↓ Skip to main content

Hypocoagulability and Platelet Dysfunction Are Exacerbated by Synthetic Colloids in a Canine Hemorrhagic Shock Model

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypocoagulability and Platelet Dysfunction Are Exacerbated by Synthetic Colloids in a Canine Hemorrhagic Shock Model
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, November 2018
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2018.00279
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corrin J. Boyd, Melissa A. Claus, Anthea L. Raisis, Giselle Hosgood, Claire R. Sharp, Lisa Smart

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 12 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2018.
All research outputs
#18,655,700
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#4,209
of 6,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,420
of 343,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#83
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.