↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Endogenous Neuroprotective Mechanisms in the Prevention of Retinal Ganglion Cells Degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Endogenous Neuroprotective Mechanisms in the Prevention of Retinal Ganglion Cells Degeneration
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2018.00834
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marita Pietrucha-Dutczak, Marialaura Amadio, Stefano Govoni, Joanna Lewin-Kowalik, Adrian Smedowski

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 23%
Neuroscience 12 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 29 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2018.
All research outputs
#17,113,100
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#7,605
of 11,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,061
of 356,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#176
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.