The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Functional Analysis of MAX2 in Phototropins-Mediated Cotyledon Flattening in Arabidopsis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.01507 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qing-Ping Zhao, Xiao-Nan Wang, Nan-Nan Li, Zi-Yi Zhu, Shi-Chao Mu, Xiang Zhao, Xiao Zhang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 47% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 16% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,331,227
of 24,958,301 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,283
of 23,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,725
of 354,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#118
of 468 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,958,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,890 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 468 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.