↓ Skip to main content

Assembly of a pan-genome from deep sequencing of 910 humans of African descent

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 7,698)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
283 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
595 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assembly of a pan-genome from deep sequencing of 910 humans of African descent
Published in
Nature Genetics, November 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41588-018-0273-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel M. Sherman, Juliet Forman, Valentin Antonescu, Daniela Puiu, Michelle Daya, Nicholas Rafaels, Meher Preethi Boorgula, Sameer Chavan, Candelaria Vergara, Victor E. Ortega, Albert M. Levin, Celeste Eng, Maria Yazdanbakhsh, James G. Wilson, Javier Marrugo, Leslie A. Lange, L. Keoki Williams, Harold Watson, Lorraine B. Ware, Christopher O. Olopade, Olufunmilayo Olopade, Ricardo R. Oliveira, Carole Ober, Dan L. Nicolae, Deborah A. Meyers, Alvaro Mayorga, Jennifer Knight-Madden, Tina Hartert, Nadia N. Hansel, Marilyn G. Foreman, Jean G. Ford, Mezbah U. Faruque, Georgia M. Dunston, Luis Caraballo, Esteban G. Burchard, Eugene R. Bleecker, Maria I. Araujo, Edwin F. Herrera-Paz, Monica Campbell, Cassandra Foster, Margaret A. Taub, Terri H. Beaty, Ingo Ruczinski, Rasika A. Mathias, Kathleen C. Barnes, Steven L. Salzberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,175 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 595 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 595 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 127 21%
Researcher 108 18%
Student > Master 60 10%
Student > Bachelor 42 7%
Other 36 6%
Other 97 16%
Unknown 125 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 185 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 147 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 5%
Computer Science 24 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 2%
Other 54 9%
Unknown 143 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 787. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#25,559
of 26,240,084 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#38
of 7,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#433
of 451,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#2
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,240,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.